Wow. That was a comprehensive rebuke or retaliation ripe with verbal violence and vitriol.

Will your views be afforded a response from Ms. Wildfire equal to the sweat you have poured into your article?

You write well, there is no question toward that, and your argument is articulated in your own voice as true to your opinion, which you have every right as a human to hold.

Jessica, too has this right to spew her vitriol against males and lambaste all for the disgusting behavior of a few.

It is agreed between the two of you that mutilation of rapists would be an appropriate deterrent, but that is the only ground you share.

As a non-neutered male I find value in much of your argument though the passion later in the article is, for me on this platform, bordering on excessive.

The hatred and loathing you pointedly direct at Ms Wildfire, as a feminist, weakens, in my opinion, the latter part of a well-rounded discourse, though I may not agree with all of it, as I do not agree with much of the broad feminist brush that Ms. Wildfire waves.

As an observer of this keen fencing of opinions, what will now define the quality of opinions lies in Ms Wildfire's response.

Will your penned views be addressed or whitewashed with a stereotype-laden response?

The quality, clarity and depth of one's conviction rises most respectfully from analytical thought and an acceptance of understanding, not from the tempests and maelstrom of emotion.

The bravery and justifications to profess your opinions is admirable.

Will the privilege of a response, other than my drivel, be afforded to you?

It shall be interesting to see.